Special Relativity depends on 2 precepts: the constant speed of light and the laws of physics being the same in all directions.

the second can be taken to mean that the laws of the universe are symmetrical in all time and spatial directions and orientations ie it has no directionality

But we need to explain why relativity holds so well when we also know it is not complete and there is evidence of assymetry in parity/chirality and the dubbed axis of evil of assymetrically rotating galaxies 10 degrees either side off our dipole.

Start from our methods of measurement

we can take the measureable dimension of the universe to be a function of light since light defines the measureable boundary so if light is emitted in all directions from the start of the big bang then the universe is a sort of expanding 4D sphere although our domain may only be the surface of that sphere

i suggest the key to the incompleteness is in recognising the importance of the term “sort of”

because the universe consists of matter, antimatter, dark energy etc these energies must alter the speed of light by different amounts in different directions (assuming general relativity to be absolutely correct in this measureable locality)

So arguably the radius of the universe from the centre (which is not connected to the spacetime plane as it is not on the surface) in all directions is not equal ie the surface of the universe is slightly rippled.

this means that the assumption of uniform speed of light like everything else mathematical is a platonic assumption and it this discrepancy that hides the secrets.

this discrepancy means that a non uniformly expanding n-dimensional universe at its outer limit ie point of origin of big bang stretched out over a finite n-1 dimensional “edge” confers a a non zero curl function giving a net angular/tangential differential that varyies as the speed of light varies in different directions ,hence there might be a supradimensionally analagous equivalent to net angular momentum and torque for the universe.it is only when you take the average speed to be equal in all directions that you end up ironing out the extra dimensions with a uniform relativistic but inevitably incomplete picture.the discrepancies give rise to directional dependency that unmasks the hidden dimesions and multiverses beyond.

the consistency of relativity is based on finite measurements in any finite direction and do not take account of the event horizon of the universe where the non uniformity actually is and hence never shows flaws.

it is only at the time reversed border of the expanded singularity of the universe where time is static and the universe is timeless and ageless and still instantaneously connected to the big bang (and all other “time” points)where the supradimensional non uniformity confers all subsequent assymetry in the expanding domain and that gives rise to consequences from non conservation of parity,matter/antimatter/dark matter imbalance and even unidirectionality of entropy.

The imbalance/directionality of these entities may essentially be consequences of energies arising from the cosmic ripples of a supradimensional rotation.

at this unreachable extra dimensional interface there is an abrupt theoretically discontinuous change in number of dimensions and hence relativity would not apply and arguably quantum discreteness (of a sort) abruptly takes over.

however I have needed to imply the existence of non symmetrical distribution of energy for non uniform light speed over the full 4-D radius of the universe in order to explain the non symmetrical distribution of energy.

Is there embedded within this flawed logic a Godelian demonstration that each axiom is the corollary of the other and so is ultimately unproveable and but though its very existence (ie that of the universe) is therefore proof of a supradimensional universe?

and so ultimately is this the theoretical foundation for the limit of applicability of general relativity from which one must deduce it’s incompleteness which arose only from Einsteins intra-axiomatic and aesthetically guided sense of a self consistent,contained and continuous universe which is why the theory breaks down at the unmeasureable end.it is also why we have a more empathic admiration for Einsteins sense of beauty than for Planks calculably demonstrable discontinuities of nature.

so it only remains to show how quantum processes can be extended to account for the force of gravity on larger scales and not the other way round.

Glad I got that off my chest.Now…will it be a kitty korma or pussy pizza tonight…!!!! .ahh choices choices….